Experts say the polygraph is a tool that can help police and prosecutors get the information they need to get a conviction, especially if it’s on a case-by-case basis.
The polygraph can give them the information to make a conviction.
But it’s not foolproof.
The state of Texas has had to change how it tests people after two fatal police shootings.
Here’s what you need to know.
The Texas Tribune thanks its sponsors.
After two officers in Dallas were shot and killed by a gunman in 2016, Texas enacted a law that requires law enforcement officers to undergo a polygrapher exam before they can be called to testify.
The test requires the person to answer a series of questions, including questions on what he or she saw.
The questions are supposed to be straightforward, but in some cases they’ve been misinterpreted.
For instance, some people have falsely said that the polygraphers test can identify if they’ve engaged in violent behavior, such as using a knife or shooting someone, the Austin American-Statesman reported.
The truth is that if you take the polygram and give it to a cop and they say, ‘We don’t believe you’re violent, we believe you were shot at, and then you tell us who you shot, and that information is going to help us in the courtroom,'” said Mark Hovland, a criminal justice professor at the University of Texas at Austin.
The law is not always applied fairly, however, according to a new study published in the Journal of Forensic Sciences.
In the first study, researchers looked at the polygrams of 521 people who had been shot in Dallas between 2002 and 2014.
The data was compiled from interviews conducted by law enforcement.
Some were tested with the polygameters and others with a third party.
The paper, “Is a polygram a reliable tool for police interrogating defendants?,” was published in a paper titled, “Facial and body image, body language, and police interrogations: A systematic review of evidence,” by researchers from Texas A&M University and Baylor University.”
What we saw was that there was a lot more information that came out of the test that could be useful in getting a conviction,” said Jennifer Azzopardi, a professor at Baylor University and the lead author of the study.
The paper, “Is a polygram a reliable tool for police interrogating defendants?,” was published in a paper titled, “Facial and body image, body language, and police interrogations: A systematic review of evidence,” by researchers from Texas A&M University and Baylor University.
The findings are the first systematic review to look at the effectiveness of the polygraphic tests.
The study found that the questions asked by the polygams were much more informative than the information obtained through a face-to-face interview.
The tests were also less likely to be misused, which is something the Texas Department of Public Safety says is a concern.
“In a general sense, it’s kind of surprising, but I would say that when we have a suspect, they don’t want to have to face somebody, and they’re very afraid of the process,” said Chris Epps, the assistant director of the Texas Forensic Science Center at the university.
“And when you’re getting a lot of information, they’re going to ask you questions that are a little bit more in the realm of how do I know if I’m telling the truth.”
The Texas law, which went into effect in 2018, allows police to use a variety of methods to try and catch people involved in crimes before they’re arrested.
But experts say that they’ve only been able to get about half the information the polygrods can provide.
The other half of the information, according with the study, was taken from interviews with the suspect.
It’s not the only issue in the study; researchers also found that a person’s body language and facial expressions could also tell them whether a person is lying.
For example, if a person said something that was suspicious, such in the case of someone who is intoxicated, then it could potentially reveal information about how they’re feeling and about their ability to lie under pressure.
“We would expect to see that people would respond more negatively if they were being asked questions like, ‘How are you feeling?
How are you looking at this?
What’s your mood like?’ and things like that,” Hovlland said.”
There’s a lot going on with the person.
They have to have that information,” he added.”
You have to look in all the variables in a person and figure out, ‘What is the reason that person is saying these things?'””
What is their intent?
What is their motivation?
Is there something they’re doing they want to do?””
Is it a crime?
What else is going on in their life?
What about their family?
And then it’s a matter of, ‘OK, that’s what we need to look into,'” said Hovlander.
The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied Research and Technology reports that in a series conducted in 2017, researchers found polygraph tests